@article {5703, title = {The evolution of alternative mechanisms that promote outcrossing in Annonaceae, a self-compatible family of early-divergent angiosperms}, journal = {Botanical Journal of the Linnean SocietyBotanical Journal of the Linnean Society}, volume = {174}, number = {1}, year = {2014}, pages = {93-109}, isbn = {1095-8339}, author = {Pang, Chun-Chiu and Saunders, Richard MK} } @article {5680, title = {A concise bibliographic overview of Annonaceae}, journal = {Botanical Journal of the Linnean SocietyBotanical Journal of the Linnean Society}, year = {2012}, note = {***}, author = {Westra, L. Y. T. h. and Mennega, E. A. and Erkens, R. H. J.} } @article {5671, title = {Three new species of Mitrephora (Annonaceae) from Sabah, Malaysia}, journal = {Botanical Journal of the Linnean SocietyBotanical Journal of the Linnean Society}, volume = {135}, year = {2001}, note = {113}, pages = {305-314}, author = {Weerasooriya, A. D. and R. M. K. Saunders} } @article {5666, title = {A synopsis of Cyathocalyx species (Annonaceae) in Peninsular Malaysia, Sumatra, and Borneo, with descriptions of two new species}, journal = {Botanical Journal of the Linnean SocietyBotanical Journal of the Linnean Society}, volume = {152}, number = {4}, year = {2006}, month = {Dec}, pages = {513-532}, abstract = {A revised classification of the species of Cyathocalyx (Annonaceae) occurring in western Malesia (Peninsular Malaysia, Sumatra, and Borneo) is presented, with distribution maps. Fifteen species are recognized, including two that are newly described from Borneo (C. angustipetalus and C. magnifructus), which are illustrated. Several important nomenclatural changes are validated, including the elevation of Drepananthus carinatus var. deltoideus to specific rank as C. deltoideus, and the transfer of the name Parartabotrys hexagynus to Cyathocalyx as C. hexagynus. Other notable nomenclatural changes include the reduction of the name C. scortechinii to synonymy with C. pubescens. (c) 2006 The Linnean Society of London, Botanical Journal of the Linnean Society, 2006.}, isbn = {0024-4074}, author = {Wang, R. J. and Saunders, R. M. K.} } @article {5595, title = {Pollen structure, tetrad cohesion and pollen-connecting threads in Pseuduvaria (Annonaceae)}, journal = {Botanical Journal of the Linnean SocietyBotanical Journal of the Linnean Society}, volume = {143}, number = {1}, year = {2003}, pages = {69-78}, author = {Su, Yvonne C. F. and Saunders, Richard M. K.} } @article {5529, title = {The genus Goniothalamus (Annonaceae) in Sumatra}, journal = {Botanical Journal of the Linnean SocietyBotanical Journal of the Linnean Society}, volume = {139}, number = {3}, year = {2002}, month = {Jul}, pages = {225-254}, abstract = {A comprehensive taxonomic revision of the species of Goniothalamus (Blume) Hook. f. \& Thomson (Annonaceae) occurring in Sumatra and adjacent islands is presented for the first time. Fourteen species are recognized, including six endemics that are described as new to science (G. acehensis, G. alatus, G. dewildei, G. loerzingii, G. longistaminus and G. miquelianus). In addition, two species are newly recorded from Sumatra, viz. G. parallelivenius Ridl. (previously reported from Borneo), and G. wrayi King (previously reported from Peninsular Malaysia). The extensive nomenclatural confusion regarding the application of the names G. costulatus Miq. and G. opacus Bakh. f. is clarified: the names are shown to be synonymous, with the former having nomenclatural priority. The utility of specific taxonomic characters are also discussed, with particular emphasis on petal indumentum, staminal connective shape, ovary indumentum, stigma shape, monocarp size and shape, and seed indumentum. Biogeographical relationships in the genus are discussed, and the significance of the Barisan mountain range and the Quaternary volcanic tuffs around Lake Toba are highlighted as potential ecological barriers limiting dispersal. (C) 2002 The Linnean Society of London.}, keywords = {biogeography, classification, Indonesia, Malesia, new species, SYSTEMATICS, taxonomy}, author = {Saunders, R. M. K.} } @article {5530, title = {A synopsis of Goniothalamus species (Annonaceae) in Peninsular Malaysia, with a description of new species}, journal = {Botanical Journal of the Linnean SocietyBotanical Journal of the Linnean Society}, volume = {142}, year = {2003}, note = {074}, pages = {321-339}, author = {Saunders, R. M. K.} } @article {5533, title = {The diversity and evolution of pollination systems in Annonaceae}, journal = {Botanical Journal of the Linnean SocietyBotanical Journal of the Linnean Society}, volume = {169}, number = {1}, year = {2012}, pages = {222-244}, publisher = {Blackwell Publishing Ltd}, abstract = {The pollination biology of Annonaceae has received considerable attention, with data now available for >~45\% of the genera (or genus-equivalent clades) included in recent molecular phylogenetic analyses. This provides a basis for understanding evolutionary shifts in the pollination system within the family. The present study focuses on subfamilies Anaxagoreoideae, Ambavioideae and Annonoideae, for which robust, well-resolved phylogenetic trees are available. Information is summarized on the pollination biology of individual clades and the evolutionary adaptations favouring different pollinator guilds evaluated. Although the majority of species of Annonaceae are pollinated by small beetles, five other pollinator groups are known: large beetles, thrips, flies, bees and cockroaches. Small-beetle pollination is inferred as the ancestral pollination system, with all other systems being derived. Evolutionary shifts to pollination by large beetles, thrips and flies are unlikely to have been significantly constrained by previous adaptations favouring pollination by small beetles, as many of the adaptations to these different pollinator guilds are similar (including protogyny, partially enclosed floral chambers and olfactory cues). In contrast, however, the evolutionary shift to bee pollination has presumably been constrained by both protogyny (as pollen-collecting bees are unlikely to visit pistillate-phase flowers) and the presence of floral chambers.~{\textcopyright} 2012 The Linnean Society of London, Botanical Journal of the Linnean Society, 2012, 169, 222{\textendash}244.}, keywords = {cantharophily, pollination ecology, reproductive biology}, isbn = {1095-8339}, author = {Saunders, Richard M. K.} } @article {5534, title = {A synopsis of Goniothalamus species (Annonaceae) in Thailand, with descriptions of three new species}, journal = {Botanical Journal of the Linnean SocietyBotanical Journal of the Linnean Society}, volume = {156}, number = {3}, year = {2008}, note = {Saunders, Richard M. K. Chalermglin, Piya}, month = {Mar}, pages = {355-384}, abstract = {A comprehensive taxonomic revision of Goniothalamus species (Annonaceae) occurring in Thailand is presented for the first time. Twenty-five species are recognized, including three that are described as new to science (Goniothalamus aurantiacus from South-Western Thailand, Goniothalamus maewongensis from Northern Thailand, and Goniothalamus rongklanus from Northern and North-Eastern Thailand). Several taxonomic and nomenclatural misunderstandings are corrected. The name G. griffithii is shown to be widely misapplied for populations in Northern Thailand, for which the name G. calvicarpus should be applied; {\textquoteright}true{\textquoteright} G. griffithii is restricted to South-Western Thailand and Myanmar. In addition, the widely used name G. marcanii is shown to be a synonym of G. tamirensis, and the name G. latestigma, previously regarded as a synonym of G. undulatus, is reinstated. Goniothalamus cheliensis is furthermore newly recorded from Thailand. Most species are restricted to Peninsular Thailand and represent a Malesian floristic component. (C) 2008 The Linnean Society of London.}, isbn = {0024-4074}, author = {Saunders, R. M. K. and Chalermglin, P.} } @article {5535, title = {A new species of Goniothalamus (Annonaceae) from New Caledonia, representing a significant range extension for the genus}, journal = {Botanical Journal of the Linnean SocietyBotanical Journal of the Linnean Society}, volume = {155}, number = {4}, year = {2007}, note = {Saunders, Richard M. K. Munzinger, Jerome}, month = {Dec}, pages = {497-503}, abstract = {A previously unknown Annonaceae species from the South Pacific island of New Caledonia is described as Goniothalamus dumontetii. This is the first Goniothalamus species reported from the island, and the easternmost record for the genus. It is easily distinguished from its congeners by the shape of the monocarp (flattened elongate with lateral triangular projections), which reflects the shape of the seeds (flattened rhombohedral). The conservation status of the species is evaluated as endangered (EN) using World Conservation Union (IUCN) red list categories, as it is known from only one relatively small population. The interpretation of geological and molecular data suggests that Goniothalamus dispersed to New Caledonia relatively recently, and does not represent a relict of the break-up of Gondwana. (c) 2007 The Linnean Society of London, Botanical Journal of the Linnean Society, 2007, 155, 497-503.}, isbn = {0024-4074}, author = {Saunders, R. M. K. and Munzinger, J.} } @article {5397, title = {The evolution of alternative mechanisms that promote outcrossing in Annonaceae, a self-compatible family of early-divergent angiosperms}, journal = {Botanical Journal of the Linnean SocietyBotanical Journal of the Linnean Society}, year = {2013}, pages = {n/a-n/a}, abstract = {Annonaceae flowers are generally hermaphroditic and show high levels of outcrossing, but unlike many other early-divergent angiosperms lack a self-incompatibility mechanism. We reassess the diversity of mechanisms that have evolved to avoid self-pollination in the family. Protogyny occurs in all hermaphroditic flowers in the family, preventing autogamy but not geitonogamy. Herkogamy is rare in Annonaceae and is likely to be less effective as beetles move randomly around the flowers in search of food and/or mates. Geitonogamy is largely avoided in Annonaceae by combining protogyny with floral synchrony, manifested as either pistillate/staminate-phase synchrony (in which pistillate-phase and staminate-phase flowers do not co-occur on an individual) or heterodichogamy (in which two phenologically distinct and reproductively isolated morphs coexist in populations). Unisexual flowers have evolved independently in several lineages, mostly as andromonoecy (possibly androdioecy). Functionally monoecious populations have evolved from andromonoecious ancestors through the loss of staminate function in structurally hermaphroditic flowers. This has been achieved in different ways, including incomplete pollen/stamen development and delayed anther dehiscence. Angiosperms display an enormous diversity of mechanisms to promote xenogamy, many of which are easily overlooked without fieldwork. Floral phenology is particularly important, especially cryptic differences in timing of organ maturation or abscission.~{\textcopyright} 2013 The Linnean Society of London, Botanical Journal of the Linnean Society, 2013, 00, 000{\textendash}000.}, keywords = {autogamy, delayed anther dehiscence, dichogamy, dioecy, floral synchrony, geitonogamy, herkogamy, incomplete pollen development, protogyny, self-incompatibility, xenogamy}, isbn = {1095-8339}, author = {Pang, Chun-Chiu and Saunders, Richard M. K.} } @article {5223, title = {Macrophotographic wood atlas of Annonaceae}, journal = {Botanical Journal of the Linnean SocietyBotanical Journal of the Linnean Society}, volume = {169}, number = {1}, year = {2012}, pages = {135-189}, publisher = {Blackwell Publishing Ltd}, abstract = {In this article, a general description of the microscopic wood anatomy of Annonaceae is given. We provide a description of the wood anatomical features of the family and of all subfamilies and tribes, all from material in the Utrecht Wood collection. Hand-lens images can be an important help in identification, not only at the family level, but also at the level of genera or below, notwithstanding the fact that the number of characters that can be easily observed in end-grain photographs is restricted. The differences are often slight and difficult to summarize in a few words, making illustrations an indispensable tool. Therefore, we provide end-grain photographs of cross-sections of wood of 66 genera and >~90 species of Annonaceae. The variation seen in lens key characters is discussed against the framework of the current phylogenetic tree of the family. Additional remarks on microscopic features are given when appropriate.~{\textcopyright} 2012 The Linnean Society of London, Botanical Journal of the Linnean Society, 2012, 169, 135{\textendash}189.}, keywords = {lens key characters, phylogenetic tree, wood anatomy}, isbn = {1095-8339}, author = {Koek-Noorman, Jifke and Westra, Lubbert Y. T.} } @article {5139, title = {How diverse are Annonaceae with regard to pollination?}, journal = {Botanical Journal of the Linnean SocietyBotanical Journal of the Linnean Society}, volume = {169}, number = {1}, year = {2012}, pages = {245-261}, publisher = {Blackwell Publishing Ltd}, abstract = {Studies during the last decades on representatives of Annonaceae have revealed their diversification with regard to pollination. Examples are given of species pollinated by beetles (cantharophily), which is the predominant mode of the majority of species worldwide, by small or large beetles (both groups having either diurnal or nocturnal flowers with or without thermogenesis), species pollinated by thrips (Thysanoptera), flies (myiophily and sapromyiophily), cockroaches and even bees (melittophily). Adaptational features of floral structures are compared with the behaviour of flower visitors, emphasizing floral rhythm, flower size, petal thickness, stamen structure and odour production. Anaxagorea, the earliest divergent surviving genus in Annonaceae, exhibits floral characters thought to be basal for the family: tissue-rich thick petals that form a pollination chamber; several Anaxagorea spp. exhibit thermogenesis, emit a fruit-like odour and attract small beetles as pollinators. As cantharophily is plesiomorphic in Anaxagorea and in Annonaceae, characters associated with beetle pollination appear imprinted in members of the whole family. Even non-cantharophilous species retain one or more characteristic features of beetle-pollinated species, such as thick petals, flattened and sclerified connective shields or protogynous dichogamy.~{\textcopyright} 2012 The Linnean Society of London, Botanical Journal of the Linnean Society, 2012, 169, 245{\textendash}261.}, keywords = {Anaxagorea, cantharophily, cockroaches, flower structures, melittophily, myiophily, sapromyiophily, thermogenesis, thrips}, isbn = {1095-8339}, author = {Gottsberger, Gerhard} } @article {5136, title = {Floral scent in Annonaceae}, journal = {Botanical Journal of the Linnean SocietyBotanical Journal of the Linnean Society}, volume = {169}, number = {1}, year = {2012}, pages = {262-279}, publisher = {Blackwell Publishing Ltd}, abstract = {Many species of Annonaceae are known for their distinctive, penetrating floral aromas. Numerous pollination studies have documented floral scents which probably play a key role in specialized pollination strategies. In particular, floral scents appear to play crucial roles in deceptive pollination strategies, contributing to floral mimicry of ripe or decaying fruits, fungi and, potentially, carrion or faeces. Occasionally, floral scent may advertise genuine floral rewards, as is the case for two species of Unonopsis pollinated by male euglossine bees. To date, ten studies have chemically characterized floral scent for 24 species representing 11 genera of Annonaceae. In this review, I discuss the chemical composition and diversity of the analysed floral scents in Annonaceae. I also summarize and discuss a wide range of (human) perceptual descriptions of floral scent found throughout the literature on Annonaceae. I have framed discussions of floral scent in Annonaceae in ecological and evolutionary contexts whenever possible.~{\textcopyright} 2012 The Linnean Society of London, Botanical Journal of the Linnean Society, 2012, 169, 262{\textendash}279.}, keywords = {basal angiosperm, floral odour, mimicry, pollination strategy, scent ecology, SPME}, isbn = {1095-8339}, author = {Goodrich, Katherine R.} } @article {5058, title = {Radiations and key innovations in an early branching angiosperm lineage (Annonaceae; Magnoliales)}, journal = {Botanical Journal of the Linnean SocietyBotanical Journal of the Linnean Society}, volume = {169}, number = {1}, year = {2012}, pages = {117-134}, publisher = {Blackwell Publishing Ltd}, abstract = {Biologists are fascinated by species-rich groups and have attempted to discover the causes for their abundant diversification. Comprehension of the causes and mechanisms underpinning radiations and detection of their frequency will contribute greatly to the understanding of the evolutionary origin of biodiversity and its ecological structure. A dated and well-resolved phylogenetic tree of Annonaceae was used to study diversification patterns in the family in order to identify factors that drive speciation and the evolution of morphological (key) characters. It was found that, except for Goniothalamus, the largest genera in the family are not the result of radiations. Furthermore, the difference in species numbers between subfamilies Annonoideae (former long branch clade) and Malmeoideae (former short branch clade) cannot be attributed to significant differences in the diversification rate. Most of the speciation in Annonaceae is not distinguishable from a random branching process (i.e. chance), and no special explanations are therefore necessary for the distribution of species richness across the major part of the phylogenetic tree for Annonaceae. Only for a small number of clades can key innovations be invoked to explain the elevated rate of diversification.~{\textcopyright} 2012 The Linnean Society of London, Botanical Journal of the Linnean Society, 2012, 169, 117{\textendash}134.}, keywords = {adaptive radiation, rate shift, sister-group comparison, stochastic branching pattern, temporal method, topological method}, isbn = {1095-8339}, author = {Erkens, Roy H. J. and Chatrou, Lars W. and Couvreur, Thomas L. P.} } @article {5064, title = {A concise bibliographic overview of Annonaceae}, journal = {Botanical Journal of the Linnean SocietyBotanical Journal of the Linnean Society}, year = {2012}, author = {Erkens, R. H. J. and Mennega, E. A. and Westra, L. Y. T. h} } @article {4980, title = {Keys to the genera of Annonaceae}, journal = {Botanical Journal of the Linnean SocietyBotanical Journal of the Linnean Society}, volume = {169}, number = {1}, year = {2012}, pages = {74-83}, publisher = {Blackwell Publishing Ltd}, abstract = {Identification keys are provided for all genera currently recognized in Annonaceae. Separate keys are presented for the Neotropics (34 genera), Africa-Madagascar (40 genera) and Asia-Australasia (42 genera). These keys are based on a combination of vegetative and fertile characters.~{\textcopyright} 2012 The Linnean Society of London, Botanical Journal of the Linnean Society, 2012, 169, 74{\textendash}83.}, keywords = {identification, synonymy, taxonomy}, isbn = {1095-8339}, author = {Couvreur, Thomas L. P. and Maas, Paul J. M. and Meinke, Svenja and Johnson, David M. and Ke{\ss}Ler, Paul J. A.} } @article {4952, title = {The natural history of Annonaceae}, journal = {Botanical Journal of the Linnean SocietyBotanical Journal of the Linnean Society}, volume = {169}, number = {1}, year = {2012}, pages = {1-4}, publisher = {Blackwell Publishing Ltd}, isbn = {1095-8339}, author = {Chatrou, Lars W. and Erkens, Roy H. J. and Richardson, James E. and Saunders, Richard M. K. and Fay, Michael F.} } @article {4957, title = {A new subfamilial and tribal classification of the pantropical flowering plant family Annonaceae informed by molecular phylogenetics}, journal = {Botanical Journal of the Linnean SocietyBotanical Journal of the Linnean Society}, volume = {169}, number = {1}, year = {2012}, pages = {5-40}, publisher = {Blackwell Publishing Ltd}, abstract = {The pantropical flowering plant family Annonaceae is the most species-rich family of Magnoliales. Despite long-standing interest in the systematics of Annonaceae, no authoritative classification has yet been published in the light of recent molecular phylogenetic analyses. Here, using the largest, most representative, molecular dataset compiled on Annonaceae to date, we present, for the first time, a robust family-wide phylogenetic tree and subsequent classification. We used a supermatrix of up to eight plastid markers sequenced from 193 ingroup and seven outgroup species. Some of the relationships at lower taxonomic levels are poorly resolved, but deeper nodes generally receive high support. Annonaceae comprises four major clades, which are here given the taxonomic rank of subfamily. The description of Annonoideae is amended, and three new subfamilies are described: Anaxagoreoideae, Ambavioideae and Malmeoideae. In Annonoideae, seven tribes are recognized, one of which, Duguetieae, is described as new. In Malmeoideae, seven tribes are recognized, six of which are newly described: Dendrokingstonieae, Fenerivieae, Maasieae, Malmeeae, Monocarpieae and Piptostigmateae. This new subfamilial and tribal classification is discussed against the background of previous classifications and characters to recognize subfamilies are reviewed.~{\textcopyright} 2012 The Linnean Society of London, Botanical Journal of the Linnean Society, 2012, 169, 5{\textendash}40.}, keywords = {plastid markers, subfamilies, supermatrix, tribes}, isbn = {1095-8339}, author = {Chatrou, Lars W. and Pirie, Michael D. and Erkens, Roy H. J. and Couvreur, Thomas L. P. and Neubig, Kurt M. and Abbott, J. Richard and Mols, Johan B. and Maas, Jan W. and Saunders, Richard M. K. and Chase, Mark W.} } @article {4944, title = {A taxonomic revision and pollen morphology of the genus Dendrokingstonia (Annonaceae)}, journal = {Botanical Journal of the Linnean SocietyBotanical Journal of the Linnean Society}, volume = {168}, year = {2012}, note = {045}, pages = {76-90}, author = {Chaowasku, T. and Ke{\ss}ler, P. J. A. and Ham, R. W. J. M. van der} } @article {4946, title = {Phylogenetic relationships of the Malmeoideae (Annonaceae) based on plastid gene sequences}, journal = {Botanical Journal of the Linnean SocietyBotanical Journal of the Linnean Society}, year = {2012}, note = {***}, author = {Chaowasku, T. and Smets, E. and Van der Ham, Raymond W. J. M. and Chatrou, L. W.} } @article {4892, title = {An update of the Angiosperm Phylogeny Group classification for the orders and families of flowering plants: APG III}, journal = {Botanical Journal of the Linnean SocietyBotanical Journal of the Linnean Society}, volume = {161}, number = {2}, year = {2009}, note = {***}, pages = {105-121}, publisher = {Blackwell Publishing Ltd}, abstract = {

A revised and updated classification for the families of flowering plants is provided. Many recent studies have yielded increasingly detailed evidence for the positions of formerly unplaced families, resulting in a number of newly adopted orders, including Amborellales, Berberidopsidales, Bruniales, Buxales, Chloranthales, Escalloniales, Huerteales, Nymphaeales, Paracryphiales, Petrosaviales, Picramniales, Trochodendrales, Vitales and Zygophyllales. A number of previously unplaced genera and families are included here in orders, greatly reducing the number of unplaced taxa; these include Hydatellaceae (Nymphaeales), Haptanthaceae (Buxales), Peridiscaceae (Saxifragales), Huaceae (Oxalidales), Centroplacaceae and Rafflesiaceae (both Malpighiales), Aphloiaceae, Geissolomataceae and Strasburgeriaceae (all Crossosomatales), Picramniaceae (Picramniales), Dipentodontaceae and Gerrardinaceae (both Huerteales), Cytinaceae (Malvales), Balanophoraceae (Santalales), Mitrastemonaceae (Ericales) and Boraginaceae (now at least known to be a member of lamiid clade). Newly segregated families for genera previously understood to be in other APG-recognized families include Petermanniaceae (Liliales), Calophyllaceae (Malpighiales), Capparaceae and Cleomaceae (both Brassicales), Schoepfiaceae (Santalales), Anacampserotaceae, Limeaceae, Lophiocarpaceae, Montiaceae and Talinaceae (all Caryophyllales) and Linderniaceae and Thomandersiaceae (both Lamiales). Use of bracketed families is abandoned because of its unpopularity, and in most cases the broader circumscriptions are retained; these include Amaryllidaceae, Asparagaceace and Xanthorrheaceae (all Asparagales), Passifloraceae (Malpighiales), Primulaceae (Ericales) and several other smaller families. Separate papers in this same volume deal with a new linear order for APG, subfamilial names that can be used for more accurate communication in Amaryllidaceae s.l., Asparagaceace s.l. and Xanthorrheaceae s.l. (all Asparagales) and a formal supraordinal classification for the flowering plants.\ \© 2009 The Linnean Society of London, Botanical Journal of the Linnean Society, 2009, 161, 105\–121.

}, keywords = {angiosperm classification, APG system, classification system, DNA phylogenetics, phylogenetic classification}, isbn = {1095-8339}, author = {APGIII} }